Lupine Publishers - Journals of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Risk Predictive Factors to Convert Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy into Other Procedures by Eldo E Frezza in Lupine Publishers
Introduction
Conclusion
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is nowadays the procedure of choice
for cholecystitis. The intraoperative finding can make
this procedure quite tricky such as dense adhesions at calot’s triangle,
fibrotic and contracted gallbladder, acutely inflamed or
gangrenous gallbladder, cholcystoenteric fistula, etc. There are also
risk factors which make laparoscopic surgery difficult like
old age, male sex, obesity, previous abdominal surgery, thickened
gallbladder wall, distended gallbladder, pericholecystic fluid
collection, impacted stone, etc.
Methods: This is a one cohort retrospective review of patients admitted to the hospital with acute cholecystitis who during LC
were converted to intraoperative cholecystostomy tube placement (CCT) or to open cholecystectomy (OC). Preoperative risk factors
to predict difficult cholecystectomy were evaluated.
Results: Medical records were reviewed retrospectively from
January 2010 through December 2016. IRB approval was
obtained. LC was performed in 556 cases between 2010-2016, with 56 (10%)
conversion: 39 CCT and 17 OC. The highest reason
for conversion are Perioperative fluid around the gallbladder before
surgery on the ultrasound (10%), preoperative thickness of
the gallbladder (9%), Impacted stones (7%) are the predicting factor
that have more changes to turn the LC into a different surgical
approach. These three parameters are followed by Prior Hospitalization
(3%) and presence of abdominal scar (5%). Essential
factors to make a problematic surgery were postoperative perivasculitis
(2%), obesity (8%), difficult liver mobilization (1%), acute
and scleroatrophic cholecystitis (1%), “porcelain gallbladder” (2%).
Causes of bleeding during our operation were: cirrhosis (2%),
accidental adhesion tearing (0.5%) (Table 1).
Conclusion: Problematic LC can be diagnoses before the surgery and make the OR team ready for different surgical approach.
Keywords: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Open Cholecystectomy; Cholecystostomy Tube; Difficult Cholecystectomy; Predictive
Factors for Difficult Surgery.
Introduction
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is nowadays the procedure
of choice for cholecystitis [1]. The intraoperative finding can make
this procedure quite tricky such as dense adhesions at calot’s triangle,
fibrotic and contracted gallbladder, acutely inflamed or gangrenous
gallbladder, cholcystoenteric fistula, etc. [2]. There are also risk
factors which make laparoscopic surgery difficult like old age, male
sex, obesity, previous abdominal surgery, thickened gallbladder
wall, distended gallbladder, pericholecystic fluid collection,
impacted stone, etc. [3]. A cholecystostomy is an opening made in the
gallbladder, to place a tube for drainage. John Stough Bobbs, in 1867,
was the first to described it [4,5]. It has been used in 1) person is ill,
and 2) to defer cholecystectomy [6]. Todd Baron and Mark Topazian
in 2007 place the first percutaneous Cholecustostomy Tube using
ultrasound guidance [7]. The role of Cholecystostomy tube (CCT) is
controversial in current surgical practice [8]. In critically ill patients,
cholecystostomy tubes should remain in place until the patient is
deemed medically suitable to undergo cholecystectomy. Removal
of the cholecystostomy tube without subsequent cholecystectomy
was reported associated with a high incidence of recurrences. [9]
Attempts to predict intraoperative difficulties was described and
included, palpable gallbladder, pericholecystic fluid, male more
than female incidence, etc. [11], but still is not an 100% given all
patients are different. Technical and tactical solutions to deal with
complicated cholecystitis surgery were reported [10] but cannot
be always applicable. Our study is based on the assumption that
difficulty cholecystectomy can be defined before the surgery and
give the opportunity to the surgical team to prepare for alternate
surgeries option like Open Cholecystectomy (OC) or intraoperative
Cholecystostomy Tube placement (CTT).
Methods
This is a retrospective review of patients admitted to the
hospital who were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis who
underwent an initial laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. The study
was designed to find those patients who were converted in other
surgery than LLC and check if the preoperative work out was
predictive of failure of LLC. The Cohort taken in consideration were
those who converted into Cholecystostomy Tube Placement (CCT)
or to open cholecystectomy (OC). Medical records were reviewed
for demographic data, diagnoses, imaging, complications, and
outcomes: from January 2010 through December 2016 from the
same surgeon. IRB approval was obtained.
a) Inclusion Criteria: All patients who underwent LC from
January 2010 to December 2016 were included in the study.
b) Exclusion Criteria:
i. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with other
laparoscopic intervention in the same setting.
ii. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with Common Bile Duct
(CBD) exploration.
iii. Absolute contraindications to LC like cardiovascular,
pulmonary disease, coagulopathies, and end-stage liver disease.
Demographic symptoms sings of presentations were evaluated
to find if those were impacting on our surgeries and addresses
the activities of the cholecystectomy. The evaluated risk were
the following: history os hospitalization, palpable gallbladder,
thicken gallbladder, peri-cholecystitis fluid, impacted stones at
the neck, abdominal scar. The characteristic of the patients was
reported in Table 1.
Pre And Intraoperative
A detailed proforma was in place before the surgery to record
information regarding patient history, physical examination,
laboratory parameters, ultrasonography (USG) findings and intraoperative
details.
Operative Technique
After obtaining an informed consent including an option for CCT
and OC the patient was taken to the operating room placed under
general anesthesia and prep in the usual fashion. The first incision
was done in the left upper quadrant with a knife and a trocar, and a
camera was advanced through the tissue under direct vision. Once
in the abdomen, we obtained a pneumoperitoneum of 15mmHg.
We place 2 five mm trocars in the right upper quadrant, one at the
level of the belly button of 5 mm. The initial trocar was switched to
a 12mm trocars. Evaluation of the Right upper quadrant and the
gallbladder was made.
Critical Factors
The crititical factor evaluated to continue the LC or turned into
CCT or OC: 1) a change of the color of the gallbladder (green etc),
2) multiple adhesion which could not be taken out, 3) inability to
grab the gallbladder after aspirating with the needle, 4) failure to
see after the body of the gallbladder and define the neck of the
gallbladder without good vision of the area of the common bile
duct.
CCT
The fundus of the gallbladder was open with the Bovie. The
fluid was aspirated, and the stones inside in the gallbladder were
taken out by grasping with a laparoscopic Babcock after all the
stones were cleaned and placed one by one in a separate bag
inserted in the abdomen. The bag was closed. We then whased the
gallbladder with saline, which also helps to mobilize hidden stones.
The camera was then advance inside the gallbladder and evaluated
from inside visualize the cystic duct. Once we know they there no
other stones obstructing, a 2/0 silk purse string was placed at the
fundus opening. With a separate incision, a Foley 18 French was
inserted in the abdomen and the tip placed inside the gallbladder.
The purse string was tied, and the balloon of the Foley was filled
with seven ml. of saline. A Jackson Prat was placed at the liver fossa
and secure with a 2/0 nylon to the skin. Same suture was used to
secure the CCT to the skin. as we did to achieve the Foley now new
cholecystostomy tube. The CCT was connected to a Foley bag and
left on gravity. Given the difficult to have a real CCT, we usually use
a Foley 18 French as CCT tube. We wash the abdomen and close
the trocars with 4/0 monocryl and dermabond. After surgery,
the patient was allowed to advance the diet and walk. Most of the
patients were discharged within 36 hours with home health.
OC
If the CCT was not possible with a knife, we made a subcostal
incision. The incision was then taken down with the bouvie while
separating the muscle. Once in the abdomen, we close the gas
insufflation. Few laps were placed on the stomach, duodenum
and colon side. The gallbladder was grasped with a kelly clamp
and dissected with bouvie from the liver. Once at the neck of the
gallbladder was visualized the artery and the cystic duct, were
dissected either between clips or with vascular staplers. Jackson
Prat ten French drainage was placed in the liver fossa and secure to
the skin. The wound was closed in layers with one vycril and stapler
for the skin. The patient was allowed fluid, they were placed on PCA
pump and discharge home with home health care within 4 days.
Post OP Treatment of the CCT
The tube was left on biliary bag drainage, Cholangiogram is
ordered between week 4 and 6. If no stones were found from the
cholangiogram the tube was pulled out in the office otherwise redo
surgery was scheduled.
Results
556 cases were performed between 2010-2016 by the same
surgeon, Total 56 patients (10%) who match our criteria were
converted: 39 CCT and 17 OC. The surgery was performed by the
same surgeon in different hospitals. Mean intraoperative time
was 51 ± 26 min (range 27–77min) in CCT and 53 ± 28min (range
25–81 min) in OC. Postoperative hospital stay was 1.4 ± 0.4 days
in CCT and 4 ± 1 in OC (p< 0.05). The operative data, time bleeding
and postoperative hospital stay, seromas incidence were collected
and reported in Table 1. The following comorbidities were founded:
cardiovascular disease (20 patients), respiratory failure (10
patients). At 30 days, the morbidity associated with the CCT itself
was 4% while OC was 70%. Of the patients who underwent CCT
only one (10%) underwent LC after 30 days. Perioperative fluid
around the gallbladder before surgery on the ultrasound (10%),
preoperative thickness of the gallbladder (9%), Impacted stones
(7%) are the predicting factor that have more changes to turn the
LC into a different surgical approach. These three parameters are
followed by Prior Hospitalization (3%) and presence of abdominal
scar (5%) (Table 1). Essential factors to make a problematic surgery
were: postoperative perivasculitis (2%), obesity (8%), difficult
liver mobilization (1%), acute and scleroatrophic cholecystitis
(1%), “porcelain gallbladder” (2%). Causes of bleeding during our
operation were: cirrhosis (2%), accidental adhesion tearing (0.5%)
(Table 1).
Discussion
With the help of accurate prediction, the high-risk patient may
be informed beforehand regarding probability of conversion to OC
or CCT. This discuss will also help the surgeon and the OR team to
prepare the alternative surgeries. Surgeons should be aware of the
possible complications that may arise in high-risk patients.
Risk Predictors Factors
Male sex makes surgery difficult as being reported in studies
[10-12]. Conversion rate and significantly higher mortality [13,8]
and found to be a significant factor. Subtotal cholecystectomy,
antegrade and fundus first techniques which is now being
more commonly done during LC were associated with lower
complications and conversion rate. Other risk factors for
difficulty surgery are reported as increased age, acute and thick
wall chronic cholecystitis, wide and short cystic duct, cholecyst
digestive fistula, previous upper abdominal surgery, obesity,
liver cirrhosis, anatomic variation, cholangiocarcinoma, and low
surgeon’s caseload [14]. Although decompression and drainage
of the gallbladder through a radiological placed cholecystostomy
tube may be used as a temporary treatment of acute cholecystitis
in ill population, there is still some debate about the management
of the tube and the subsequent need for a cholecystectomy. Other
authors reported 105 patients, 12 (11.4%) required conversion
to open cholecystectomy. They pointed out that their significant
predictors of conversion were body mass index> 30Kg/m2, male
gender, history of acute cholecystitis or acute pancreatitis, the
recent history of upper abdominal surgery, and gallbladder wall
thickness exceeding 3mm [15]. Thickened gallbladder wall is
an ultrasonographic finding of acute cholecystitis, and it was a
significant factor in previous studies [16-18]. James Majeski [16],
showed that a preoperative gallbladder ultrasound evaluation with
a thick gallbladder wall (>3mm) and calculi, is a clinical warning for
a problematic laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure which may
require conversion to an open cholecystectomy procedure [19].
But Carmody concluded that detailed preoperative ultrasound
evaluation of the gallbladder in patients destined for laparoscopic
cholecystectomy is of little value in screening for difficult or
unsuitable cases. They found that there were no ultrasound
features that can differentiate between the unsuccessful, confusing,
or uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomy [20]. In our study
thickened gallbladder wall was present in all patients and outcome
was found to be dependent on this variable by chi-square test (p
= 0.001), and logistic regression analysis also ascertained the
significance of this factor for prediction (p = 0.005). Pericholecystic
fluid is an ultrasonographic finding of acute cholecystitis. This
was found to be a significant factor in our study (p = 0.939), as
well as palpable gallbladder (p = 0.05). Therefore, we agree with
Randhawa [21] who also reported that presence of palpable
gallbladder has a significant bearing on define difficult surgery.
Difficulty in gallbladder grasping was associated significantly with
the conversion. A distended gallbladder or a gallbladder filled with
stones is not easily grasped because it tends to slip away. Presence
of inflammation around the gallbladder makes the wall friable
and edematous, thus posing problems. These data were reported
by Singh [22] who also found a significant association between
difficulties in grasping a distended gallbladder and pericholecystic
inflammation. Lal [23] have identified that presence of large stones
in the gallbladder neck leads to distention and difficulty in grasping.
Cholecystostomy
Percutaneous Cholecystectomy (PCCT) is primarily indicated
for accessing the gallbladder to manage cholecystitis or to serve
as a portal to remove or dissolve gallstones [24,25]. In the current
literature and clinical practice, surgeon and internal medicine
physician continue to recommend PCCT as an alternative to surgical
cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis deemed poor
surgical candidates. This trend is mainly based on retrospective
studies [24,25,9] and anecdotal clinical experience, which result
in an inconsistent and unsupported utilization of PCCT. The
recommendation of PCCT over surgical alternatives will continue to
be based mostly on clinical intuition until randomized, controlled
trials answer a series of questions regarding the treatment of acute
cholecystitis [8]. If surgical options under general anesthesia can
be avoided by a fast, simple, low-risk procedure under conscious
sedation in any patient, it stands to reason that that procedure
should become the new primary treatment option. Controversy
and confusion over the application of PCCT raise a critical question:
Does the existing, albeit insufficient, literature support the potential
use of PCCT as a first-line and potentially definitive therapy for any
cases of acute cholecystitis? PCCT should be still considered in a
critical ill patient who cannot stand general anesthesia. Some other
authors were close to our concept and tried to dissolve the stones
to avoid another surgery by placing CCT laparoscopically.
Authors have employed the cholecystostomy tract to facilitate
removal of gallstones by basket extraction [26] dissolution
with bile acids, and destruction and retrieval with shock-wave
lithotripsy [27,28,29]. Retrospective studies have demonstrated
a gallstone recurrence rate of ∼10 to 30% per year and a
symptomatic recurrence rate requiring repeat treatment of
∼6 to 18% per year. Stone removal can be repeated as needed,
but the high rate of symptomatic recurrence and the risks and
consequences of recurrent acute cholecystitis may limit the future
of this option as a definitive treatment. With nowadays improved
laparoscopic technique the conversion rate should be minimal in
our experience is only 10%. The highest reason for conversion are
Perioperative fluid around the gallbladder before surgery on the
ultrasound (10%), preoperative thickness of the gallbladder (9%),
Impacted stones (7%) are the predicting factor that have more
changes to turn the LC into a different surgical approach. These
three parameters are followed by Prior Hospitalization (3%) and
presence of abdominal scar (5%) (Table 1) and made high risk
for performing another surgery but LLC. Other factor whoch can
predict problematic surgery were: postoperative perivasculitis
(2%), obesity (8%), difficult liver mobilization (1%), acute and
scleroatrophic cholecystitis (1%), “porcelain gallbladder” (2%).
Causes of bleeding during our operation were: cirrhosis (2%),
accidental adhesion tearing (0.5%) (Table 1).
Conclusion
Problematic LC can be diagnoses before the surgery and make
the OR team ready for different surgical approach. Conversion
should be kept less than 20% of the cases in out experience was
10%. PCCT should be still considered in a critically ill patient who
cannot stand general anesthesia.
For More information
For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishersgroup.com/
For more Open Access Journals Please visit our Lupine Publishers
Comments
Post a Comment